SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7054

LAO MORE BUSCUITS PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER – Respondent


C/LPA/2101/2011 JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2101 of 2011

In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9004 of 2011

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER

Sd/-

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. B. MAYANI

Sd/-

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to

see the judgment ?

Yes

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

No

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the

judgment ?

No

4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law

as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any

order made thereunder ?

No

LAO MORE BUSCUITS PVT. LTD.

Versus

ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER

Appearance:

MR D M AHUJA(115) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1

MS E.SHAILAJA(2671) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. B. MAYANI

Date : 19/11/2018

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER)

Page 1

C/LPA/2101/2011 JUDGMENT

1.

Heard

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top