SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 4623

BRACKISH WATER RESEARCH CENTRE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
['AJ YAGNIK', 'GOVERNMENT PLEADER', 'DS AFF NOT FILED N', 'AMRITA M THAKORE', 'ARPIT A KAPADIA', 'NANAVATI AND CO']

C/WPPIL/52/2016 CAV JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.  52 of 2016

With 

R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 16 of 2016

 

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: 

 

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Sd/­

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

Sd/­

=============================================

1      Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see 

the judgment ?

No

2      To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

No

3      Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the 

judgment ?

No

4      Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as 

to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any 

order made thereunder ?

No

=============================================

GUJARAT KHEDUT SAMAJ

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT

=============================================

Appearance:

Appearance in Writ Petition (PIL) No.52/2016

MR AJ YAGNIK(1372) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1

MR   KAMAL   TRIVEDI,   ADVOCATE   GENERAL   with   MS   SANGITA   VISHEN,   ASSISTANT 

GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3

MR   MIHIR   J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top