SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 8980

STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MANGALSINH RATIBHANSINH PARIHAR – Respondent


Advocates:
['PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', 'NISHA M PARIKH', '', 'HCLS COMMITTEE', 'SADHANA SAGAR']

R/CR.A/797/2012 CAV JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 797 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1073 of 2012

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE

Sd/-

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA

Sd/-

================================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to

see the judgment ?

Yes

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

Yes

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the

judgment ?

No

4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law

as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any

order made thereunder ?

No

================================================================

MANGALSINH RATIBHANSINH PARIHAR

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT

================================================================

Appearance:

HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5

MR JM BUDDHBHATTI for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2,3,4

MR JM BUDDHBHATTI(1239) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 5

MR.MRUDUL M BAROT(3750) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top