Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
P.P.BHATT, J
NIRAJ AJITKUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for quashing the fir with factual context and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. submissions supporting the applicants and contesting the fir's legitimacy. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning for quashing the fir due to evidence of malice. (Para 7) |
| 4. final order of the court to quash and set aside the fir. (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ”the Code”), the applicants have prayed for quashing and setting aside F.I.R. bearing C.R. No. I – 145 of 2015 registered with Vadodara City Police Station, Vadodara for the commission of offence punishable under Section s 354 , 323, 294(B), 506(2) and 114 of the of the Indian Penal Code as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR qua the applicants.
2. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and learned APP for the respondent-State.
3. The learned advocate for the applicants submits that as per the allegations, the present applicants who are advocates on record in the maintenance petition for complainant’s husband, asked her to withdraw the maintenance petition while
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
