SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 3195

SANTOSHKUMAR KODUMAL MULCHANDANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


R/CR.A/1713/2012 CAV JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1713 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1708 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1709 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1710 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1711 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1740 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1812 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1862 of 2012

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1050 of 2013

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1598 of 2013

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1599 of 2013

With

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1600 of 2013

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA

================================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to

see the judgment ?

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

Page 1 of 3422

R/CR.A/1713/2012 CAV JUDGMENT

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the

judgment ?

4 Whether this ca