SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 4118

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
DR. MAYABEN SURENDRABHAI KODNANI – Appellant
Versus
S.I.T – Respondent


COMMON CAV JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

Considering the length of the judgment, it is deemed fit to provide an index for ready reference.

:: INDEX ::

Parts Sr. No. Particulars Paragraph No.
I 1 PREFACE (BACKGROUND) AND F.I.R. 1 to 6.5
II 2 THE CHARGE 7 to 7.26
III 3 EVIDENCE ADDUCED DURING THE COURSE OF TRIAL 10 to 12
IV 4 FINAL ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT 13 to 13.32
V 5 APPEALS 14 to 15
VI 6 GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE 16 to 22
VII 7 APPLICATIONS TO THE SIT 23 to 24.3
8 Findings 25 to 25.8
VIII 9 PRINTED COMPLAINTS 26 to 26.1
10 Findings 26.2
IX 11 DYING DECLARATIONS AND FINDINGS 27 to 27.3
X 12 DELAY IN RECORDING STATEMENTS OF WITNESSES 28 to 28.10
XI 13 EVIDENCE OF EYEWITNESSES
XII 14 AFFIDAVITS 31 to 45
XIII 15 TESTIMONIES OF WITNESSES WHO MADE AFFIDAVITS FOR SUBMITTING BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT AND RELATED WITNESSES
16 PW-114 Rehmanbhai Shakurbhai Saiyed 46 to 46.35
17 PW-137 Rafikanbanu Rehmanbhai Saiyed 47 to 47.46
18 PW-141 Kaiyumkhan Rashidkhan Pathan 48 to 48.25
19 PW-147 Reshmabanu Nadeembhai Saiyed 49 to 49.65
20 PW-156 Abdulmajid Mahammadusman Shaikh 50 to 50.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top