AKSHARAY DEVELOPERS vs SHIV DEVELOPERS - 2018 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 5114

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR.PRABHAV A.MEHTA
For the Respondents: MR.NILESH A PANDYA, MR.S.P.MAJMUDAR

Table of Content
1. facts leading to the suit's filing. (Para 1 , 3)
2. legal framework and context of dispute. (Para 2 , 4 , 8 , 10 , 19)
3. assertions and objections of both parties. (Para 5 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments regarding maintainability. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. citations and judgments supporting the decision. (Para 27 , 29 , 30)
6. final ruling and implications. (Para 34 , 36)

To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the

judgment ?

Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to

the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order

made thereunder ?

AKSHARAY DEVELOPERS & 2.....Applicant(s)

Versus

SHIV DEVELOPERS & 3....Opponent(s)

Appearance:

MR.PRABHAV A.MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1-3

MR.NILESH A PANDYA, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No.3

MR.S.P.MAJMUDAR, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No.1

NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Opponent(s) No. 1-4

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

Date : 15/02/2018

ORAL JUDGMENT

[1]

Rule. Mr.Nilesh A.Pandya, learned advocate waives

service of rule on behalf of the respondent No.3 and

Mr.S.P.Majmudar, learned advocate waives service of rule on

behalf