SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
KHATIK ROHINI MISRILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Mr.L.B. Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of notice of Rule for the respondents. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and with the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, the petition is being heard and decided, finally.

2. By preferring this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have, inter-alia, prayed that the concerned Police authorities may be directed to provide police protection to the petitioners.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that both of them have attained the age of majority, being aged 23 and 22 years respectively. The petitioners were working together at Jewellery Showroom in Ahmedabad. Over a period of time, they fell in love with each other and decided to tie the marital knot. The petitioners got married on 20.07.2015 before the Registrar of Marriages under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The Marriage Registration Certificate has been produced at Annexure-A to the petition. As the marriage of the petitioners was not liked by the parents of petitioner No.1 (wife) and was performed against their will and wish, the petitioners are, therefore, living

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top