STATE OF GUJARAT vs DHIRUBHA MADHAVSINH BHATI

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Z.K.SAIYED, J
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DHIRUBHA MADHAVSINH BHATI – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MS HANSA PUNANI
For the Respondents:MR KARAN VYAS, MR KB ANANDJIWALA, SENIOR ADVOCATE

Table of Content
1. appeal filed under section 378 against acquittal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. prosecution claims evidential support for demands and acceptance. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. need for proof of demand in corruption cases. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. appeal dismissed as evidence insufficient. (Para 19)

JUDGEMENT

1. The present acquittal Appeal has been filed by the appellant – original complainant, State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Cr.

P.C., against the Judgment and order dated 12.7.2005 rendered by the learned Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption) Fast Track Court No.4, Jamnagar, in Special Case No.9 of 1993. The said case was registered against the present respondents original accused for the offence under Sections 7 , 12 and 13(1)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

2. According to the prosecution case, Investigating Officer G.J.Yadav, Police Inspector, ACB, Rajkot received secret information about the offence. Upon receiving the information running trap was arranged.

The running trap was arranged on 30.9.1992 with the help of a decoy. It is the case of the prosecution that near Vijay ParotaHouse four

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GUJARAT HIGH COURTZ.K.SAIYED, JSTATE OF GUJARAT – AppellantVersusDHIRUBHA MADHAVSINH BHATI – Respondent

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Z.K.SAIYED, J
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DHIRUBHA MADHAVSINH BHATI – Respondent