ORAL JUDGMENT

1 Rule. Ms. Chetna M Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of notice of Rule for the respondents.

2 This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred with the following prayers:

“ 9 a) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no.

3 to inquire and investigate the missing complaint lodged by the brother of the petitioner no.1 at Gandhidham-A Division Police Station being no. 13/2015 dtd.30.03.2015.

b) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and thereby be pleased to direct respondent no.3 to provide police protection in case of parents or relatives of the petitioner no.1 have filed any false case or cause any harassment to the petitioner while their stay at Gandhidham.

C) Your Lordships may be pleased grant such other and further relief as may be deemed fit in the interest of justice.”

3 At the outset, Mr. F B Brahmbhatt, learned advocate for the petitioners, states that the petitioners do not press the prayer made at paragraph 9 a), but, confines the prayer only to that contained in paragraph 9 b), regardin