SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J
BHUPENDRA S PATEL – Appellant
Versus
NITABEN J PATEL – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: PARTY-IN-PERSON
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

JUDGEMENT

1. The present Criminal Appeal is filed by the Appellant / Original Applicant – Party-in-person being with the order passed by the City Civil and Sessions Court, Bhadra, Ahmedabad in Civil Suit No. 4391 of 1998 below Exhibit 33 – 34 (chamber summons) dated 22.4.2013 rejecting the said chamber summons on the grounds stated in the appeal. It is prayed in the present Appeal:

    “Your Lordship be pleased to call for the record & proceedings of civil suit no.4391/98 from the City Civil Court, Bhadra, at a’bad & be pleased to quash & set aside the impugned judgment order dtd. 22.04.2013 passed by City Civil Court a’bad over application vid. Exh.34 & allow chamber summons at exh.33 & the lower court may be directed to file said complaint as per para 14(A&B) or otherwise a complaint may be filed by this Hon'ble. Court as also having jurisdiction to do so against proposed accuses of application vid. Exh.34 in said civil suit.”

2. Heard Shri Bhupendra Patel who appears as party-in-person at length. Shri Bhupendra Patel, party-in-person has referred to the background of the facts, which can be briefly summarized that the Civil Suit No. 4391 of 1998

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top