GUJARAT HIGH COURT
MR. BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, CJ, MR. J.B. PARDIWALA, J
SHARIFBHAI HASAMBHAI SAKRARAYANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 233 of 2013
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. unauthorized construction violations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. responsibility of municipal authorities. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's demands in pil. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. consequences of deemed permissions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. supreme court's stance on unauthorized constructions. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal implications of unauthorized construction. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. demolition orders for unauthorized structures. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 8. final ruling and directive. (Para 25 , 27) |
JUDGEMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. By this writ-application, in the nature of a public interest litigation, the petitioner, a municipal councilor of the Dhoraji Nagar Palika has brought to our notice that the private respondents have made unauthorized construction without any valid permission from the Dhoraji Municipality and also without sanction of any revised plans. According to the petitioner, the respondent no.6-Dhoraji Municipality, owes a legal duty to enforce the rules and regulations governing the building construction and also other provisions of law.
2. The case made out by the petitioner may be summed up thus:
2.1 The respondent no.5, Dhoraji Area Development Authority, is the authority for grant of permission for development within the limits of the Dhoraji town. The authority has to act in consonance with the provisions of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 (for short “the Act of 1976”). The authority is obliged to ensure that the laws relating to the building and zoning are scrupulously followed by one and all. The revised development scheme of Dhoraji of the year 1989 is applicable in case of such developmental activities.
2.2 Although many illegal constructions have been made in the Dhoraji town, yet the respondent nos.5, 6 and 7 have failed to take any steps in accordance with law.
2.3 The respondent nos.12 to 16 are the owners of the Unique School of Science. Although permission was given to the respondent nos.12 to 16 to put up construction upto the first floor, yet without any permission or sanction of necessary plans have put up construction of the second and third floor.
2.4 The respondent nos.8 to 11 although were accorded permission to put up construction of ground plus three floors according to the sanctioned plan on plot no.166, Sheet No.107, City Survey No.1602, admeasuring 553.39 sq.mtrs. yet a fourth floor has been constructed without any valid permission or sanction of the plans.
2.5 One Shri Dineshbhai Gordhanbhai Topiya and his associates have constructed one unnamed building without any valid permission from the respondent no.6, Dhoraji Nagar Palika. Although the petitioner had brought to the notice of the respondent nos.6 and 7 regarding the same by filing an application dated 19th July 2013 and 30th August 2013 respectively under the Right to Information Act, yet till date no steps have been taken for demolition of the same.
2.6 In such circumstances, referred to above, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.