SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DUDHASINH @ DUDO PANNASING HIRAVAT – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER)

1. The Appellant-State has preferred this appeal under section 377 of CrPC for enhancement of sentence imposed upon the respondent by the impugned judgment and order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No. 255/2009, whereby, the learned trial Judge has convicted the respondent for the offence under section 363 of IPC and sentenced to undergo S/I for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default, to undergo further S/I for fifteen days. The respondent is convicted under section 366 of IPC and sentenced to undergo S/I for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default, to undergo S/I for fifteen days. The respondent is also convicted under section 376 of IPC and sentenced to undergo S/I for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default, to undergo further S/I for fifteen days, which is impugned in this appeal.

2.1 The brief facts of the prosecution case is that the respondent-accused had lured daughter of complainant and thereby took her with him from her legal guardianship and kidnapped her and committed rape on her against her will and wish.

Therefore, the complaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top