IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 12666 of 2021 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA Sd/-

==========================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed NO

1	Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?	NO
2	To be referred to the Reporter or not ?	YES
3	Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?	NO
4	Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ?	NO

==========================================================

JAYKUMAR VINUBHAI @ VINODBHAI TOGADIYA THROUGH HETALBEN JAYKUMAR TOGADIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================

Appearance:

MR BM MANGUKIYA(437) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS BELA A PRAJAPATI(1946) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR L.B. DABHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MS.KRUTI SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Complainant.

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA Date : 07/04/2022

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. By way of this application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short "the Code") the applicant-accused has prayed for bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11214020210384 of 2021 registered with Kamrej Police Station, Surat Rural, District Surat, for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC).

1.1 Criminal Misc. Application No.12672 of 2021 and allied

NEUTRAL CITATION

undefined

Procedure, 1973 by the applicant along with other accused persons in the FIR being C.R. No.11214020210094 of 2021 registered with Kamrej Police Station, District Surat for the offences under Sections 120(B), 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC, is rejected by this Court by a separate order. The present FIR is different but the main accused in this FIR is the same i.e. Jatin Kantilal Patel. There are four other accused viz. Jaykumar Vinubhai Vinodbhai Togadiya – present applicant, Rajubhai N. Patel, Rajeshbhai D. Trivedi and Kamla R. Roy.

2. The allegations levelled in the FIR, in brief, are as under.

2.1 The first informant is the first wife of the main accused – Jatinbhai Kantilal Patel. She got married with the accused No.1. The first informant has two sons about 19 and 17 years of age. The accused No.1 was not taking care of the first informant and used to pick up quarrel and have entered into extramarital affair with one Nishaben and, therefore, she had taken divorce with the accused No.1 on 26.06.2019.

2.2 It is alleged that land bearing Block No.61 (old Block No.199) and Survey No.257 situated at village Kolwad, Old Block No.163 and Survey No.357 situated at village Kolwad were running in the name of Amitaben – the present first informant, Jigneshbhai and Jatin Kantilal Patel and the administration of the said land is being done by the father of the accused No.1 namely, Kantilal Patel.

2.3 It is alleged that on 23.12.2020, when the first informant went to take out the extract of Village Form No.7/12 of the said land from the ofÏce of the Mamlatdar, it was revealed that one

NEUTRAL CITATION

undefined

respect of one registered sale deed along with that, one consent afÏdavit dated 28.11.2020 of the first informant and her brother in law - Jignesh Kantilal Patel was produced with the sale deed, which is in favour of the present applicant – accused No.2 and the seller is shown as the accused No.1 Jatin Kantilal Patel. It is alleged that the forged and fabricated consent letter dated 28.11.2020, is used in the said transcation since at the relevant point of time, the accused Jignesh Kantibhai Patel was in USA on 04.12.2019 and had not returned to India and the first informant has not signed such documents and the said documents were executed in presence of Notary advocate and the so-cal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document