Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
RANJIT @ RAJESH @ BODIYO RAMJIBHAI PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application's context and arguments presented. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's observation on case details and factors influencing bail decision. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. final ruling based on evidentiary insufficiencies. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. bail conditions imposed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11193040240287 of 2024 registered with Nageshri Police Station. Amreli.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
