Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
VINODBHAI MANGALBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the application for bail regarding allegations of fraud. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity of bail versus severity of allegations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's considerations and rationale in granting bail. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11216008240349 of 2024 registered with Sector-7 Police Station, District Gandhinagar.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant had forged entire process of employment and had also conducted fake examination for recruitment to the Government department. He had also issued fake call letters to the candidates from whom, he has received money for appearing in such examination. The applicant had also booked hall for conducting such examination
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
