IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, P. M. RAVAL, JJ
RAMJI BAVLA KOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for suspension of sentence due to dna evidence. (Para 1) |
| 2. application details and initial conviction. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments presented by the applicant against the conviction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. court's observations regarding evidence and arguments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. importance of dna evidence and reasoning for suspension. (Para 8) |
| 6. conclusion and order regarding the applicant. (Para 9 , 10) |
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.
2. The Applicant – Org. Accused has preferred the present Application under Section 430 of the BNSS, 2023 seeks suspension of sentence awarded vide judgment and order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the Ld. Special Judge (POSCO) and 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Anjar at Kutch in Special POCSO Case No. 11 of 2022 convicting the Applicant for the following offences as stated hereinbelow:-
The Trial Court has further granted compensation of Rs. 2 lacs to the Victim under the Victim Compensation Scheme,
Section
Imprisonment Fine in Rs.
In default of payment of fine.
376(2) (j)(n) r/w 4 and 6 of POCSO Act
RI for life 25,000/-
SI for one month
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.