SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 4408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SANGEETA K. VISHEN, MOOL CHAND TYAGI, JJ
MOHAMMEDYUNUS MOHAMMEDIQBAL JAMADAR – Appellant
Versus
SANGITABEN D/O CHIMANBHAI CHHOTUBHAI AND W/O HARSHADBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATEL & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR SALIM M SAIYED
For the Respondents: RULE SERVED

Table of Content
1. grounds for condoning delay in appeal due to health. (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. final conclusion to allow the application. (Para 3 , 6)

(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN)

2014.

3. Heard Mr Salim M. Saiyed, learned advocate for the applicant. 4. This Court, vide order dated 21.01.2025 issued the Rule to the respondents which was made returnable in the month of February 2025. Endorsement on the Board, suggest that the Rule has been served upon the respondents; however, respondents have chosen not to enter appearance.

6. Civil Application succeeds and is accordingly allowed. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top