Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
IMRANBHAI @ PULAV HAIDARBHAI SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail citing insufficient evidence. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. court's observations on evidence and legal standards. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. arguments regarding applicant's character and prosecution's claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. criteria for granting bail including precedent. (Para 8) |
| 5. final ruling on the bail application. (Para 10 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11215002240941 of 2024 registered with Anand Town Police Station. Anand.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
