Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, P. M. RAVAL, JJ
ANKIT RAGHURAJSINH PARIHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. preventive detention based on allegations of dangerous activities. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding connection of offenses to public order. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's focus on proper legal standards for preventive detention. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling on legality of the detention order. (Para 10) |
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL)
1. The petitioner herein namely Ankit Raghurajsinh Parihar came to be preventively detained vide the detention order dated 29.05.2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, as a “dangerous person” as defined under Section 2 (c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (herein after referred as ‘the Act of 1985).
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the aforesaid order.
3. This Court has heard learned counsel Mr.D.D.Gautam and Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respective parties.
4. Learned advocate for the detenue submits that the grounds of detention has no nexus to the “public order”, but is a purely a matter of law and order, as registration of the offence cannot be said to have either affected adversely or likely to affe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
