Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO, J
ANKIT MAHENDRABHAI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint for dishonor of cheque and procedural defects. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding merits of the case and procedural adherence. (Para 2) |
| 3. opposition to appeal based on evidence comprehension. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application is filed by the applicant – original complainant seeking leave to file an appeal against the order dated 11.01.2024 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Navsari (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Trial Court”) in Criminal Case No. 322 of 2017, whereby, respondent No.1 - original accused came to be acquitted from the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as “N.I.Act”).
2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Jay Thakkar for the applicant and learned APP Mr. Pranav Dhagat for the respondent No.1 – State and learned advocate Raajen D Jadav for the respondent no.2.
3. Learned advocate Mr.Jay Thakkar for the applicant submits that the applicant is the Director of “Khushi Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd.” and was in the business of building materials and the respondent no. 2 has business transactions with the applicant as he was contractor for roads. In October- Nov
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
