SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 5890

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
JCD
JAGRUTIBEN UDAYKUMAR SONI – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL MARU – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR MEHULSHARAD SHAH(773) ,Respondent Advocate: RULE SERVED(64)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 590 of 2013 ==========================================================

JAGRUTIBEN UDAYKUMAR SONI & ORS.

Versus SUNIL MARU & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR MEHUL SHARAD SHAH(773) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3 UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Appellant(s) No. 4 MR DAKSHESH MEHTA(2430) for the Defendant(s) No. 4 MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Defendant(s) No. 2 RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,3 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI Date : 14/02/2025

ORAL ORDER

1. The present First Appeal, under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is preferred by the appellant – original claimant being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 15.07.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patan in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.4830 of

2002.

2. Brief facts of the case are as under:

2.1 On 24.02.2002, when deceased Udaykumar Soni and other persons were travelling in Maruti Car No.GJ-2-K-5048 from Mehsana to Patan, the said car dashed with Truck No.RJ-27-G- 3227 which was stationary / parked in the middle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top