Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J. C. DOSHI, J
GIRDHARBHAI CHHAGANBHAI SOLANKI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for quashing fir based on vague allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observation on the lack of specific details in fir. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. the court established abuse of process and issued a ruling. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the Criminal Complaint being C.R. No. II-3346/2013 for the offences under Section s 323 , 294(A), 506(2) read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, the IPC ) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Learned advocate Mr. N.V. Gandhi for the petitioners mainly contended that prior to the filing of the impugned FIR, petitioner No.1 had instituted Civil Suit No.313 of 2013 before the City Civil and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad. He further submitted that the Civil Court had granted interim injunction in favour of the petitioner. However, with an intent to pressurize the petitioner into a settlement, the respondent has lodged a false FIR.
3. It is submitted that the FIR alleges commission of offences under Section s 323 , 294(b), and 506(2) of the Indian Pen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
