SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 6654

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI, JJ
SAFAL CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7768 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR MIHIR JOSHI, MR DHAVAL SHAH
For the Respondents: MR UTKARSH SHARMA, MR PRADIP D BHATE

TDR under rehabilitation schemes is immovable property, not subject to GST as a service.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the application of GST on Transferable Development Right (TDR) in the context of a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, referencing relevant regulatory provisions and the nature of TDR as a benefit of rehabilitation. The court finds that TDR relates to immovable property rather than a taxable service, questioning the jurisdiction of authorities to impose GST on its transfer. The court issues notice returnable on 30th July, 2025 and grants interim relief against coercive action during the petition's pendency.

Table of Content
1. court proceedings on jurisdiction concerning gst. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.Mihir Joshi with learned advocate Mr.Dhaval Shah for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Utkarsh Sharma for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2.1. Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Mihir Joshi for the petitioners has tendered the Additional Affidavit on behalf of the petitioners to point out that as per the approval granted by the State Government for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme by order dated 18.05.2012 and by order of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation dated 29.05.2012, the work of rehabilitation under the Policy of 2010 has been awarded to the petitioners. It was pointed out from such document placed on record that petitioners are entitled to utilise the Floor Space Index (for short ‘the FSI’) as per the Policy of GDCR read with the Rehabilitation Policy, 2010.

2.2. Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Mihir Joshi also invited the attention of the Court to the Clause No.12 of the Policy which refers to Planning Regulations for Rehabilitations Scheme which includes Clause 12.5 regarding the FSI and amendment thereto, by the Notification dated 22nd May, 2012 by substituting Clause 12.6 for the purpose of the regulations. Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Mihir Joshi also referred to the Clause 12.6.4.3 which provides that the transferable FSI shall be available on any plot other than the slum plot on pro-rata basis proportionate to the land jantri rates of respective plots.

2.3. It was therefore submitted that the Transferable Development Right (for short ‘the TDR’) Certificate issued to the petitioners which is sold by the petitioners for consideration, is nothing but a benefit arising out of such Rehabilitation Scheme pertaining to the development of the slum area and therefore, it partakes the character of immovable property and not the supply of service liable to levy of GST.

2.4. It was therefore submitted that the respondent could not have assumed the jurisdiction to initiate proceedings for levy of GST on transfer of the TDR for a consideration by the petitioners.

3. Considering the above submissions, issue Notice, returnable on 30th July, 2025.

4. By way of ad-interim relief, no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner during the pendency of this petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top