Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, R. T. VACHHANI, JJ
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
BABUBHAI SAMPATBHAI PATELIYA & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issues regarding the authority of the learned single judge over the registry. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. cctv installation as a separate administrative issue. (Para 5) |
| 3. chief justice's authority maintained over registry matters. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final decision to quash previous orders and clarify authority. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORAL ORDER
(1) ADMIT. Learned advocate Mr.Shah waives service of notice of admission for and on behalf of the respondents.
(3) By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has made stigmatic observations on the Registry of this Court on the issue relating to the installation of the CCTV cameras in the Registry of this Institution. For the sake of the reputation of the Registry, we are not referring to the observations in detail.
(5) After the change in roster, the said matter was placed before another learned Single Judge, who was assigned the roster of quashing, and the same was disposed of vide order dated 16.02.2024, by the learned Single Judge apropos, the main issue of quashing is concerned. While disposing of the said matter on 16.02.2024 by the learned Single Judge (Cheekati Manavenranath Roy, J) the following observations are made:
(6) Thus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
