(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Vijay S.

Ranjan for the petitioner and learned Senior Standing Counsel Ms. Maithili D.

Mehta for the respondent.

2. This petition is filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (For short “the Act”) dated 28.08.2022 on the ground that the notice would be invalid and time barred.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent Assessing Officer issued notice dated 25.06.2021 under section 148 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 during the extended time period as per Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 [(2020) 422 ITR (St.) 116] (For short “TOLA”).

4. In view of the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India and others v. Ashish Agarwal reported in (2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC), the aforesaid notice was to be treated as notice under section 148A(b) of the Act which has come into statute with effect from 01.04.2021.

5. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal reported in (2024) 469 ITR 46 (SC) has laid down the law to consider such notice as valid notic