SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7730

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, D.N.RAY, J
NILKNTH VIKRAM TRIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5504 of 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR YH VYAS
For the Respondents: MS. HETAL PATEL, AGP, MR JINESH H KAPADIA, MRS KRISHNA G RAWAL, MR. MAULIK NANAVATI

Petition challenging compensation references irrevocably withdrawn, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.

Headnote:(A) National Highways Act, 1956 - Section 3H(3) - Constitution of India - Article 14 - Challenge against appointment of arbitrator and claim for compensation - Petitioners sought to quash the order referring their claim to a Civil Court, seek compensation under specific statutes, and argue against provisions deemed unconstitutional, asserting discrimination. (Paras 2, 3, 6, 8)

(B) Jurisdiction - Role of Civil Court - Writ jurisdiction under Article 227 does not permit factual inquiries, hence the court dismissed the reference challenge due to lack of merit. (Paras 4, 5, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged an order referring their compensation claims under the National Highways Act to the Civil Court, alleging lack of title to land.

Findings of Court:
The legal challenge to the order of reference was proved unnecessary as the primary petition had been permitted to withdraw for a different forum; thus, the main relief fell away.

Issues: The critical issue was whether a claim for land compensation could be effectively brought before the High Court given the existing factual disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that as the main relief sought was withdrawn, further adjudication on statutory provisions was unneeded, and thus the petition was rendered moot.

Result: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. challenging the order of reference and seeking to quash earlier decisions. (Para 3)
2. jurisdiction under article 227 does not allow for factual inquiries. (Para 4 , 6)
3. main relief sought was withdrawn, rendering the petition moot. (Para 7 , 8)

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)

1. The present petition has been filed by two persons namely petitioner no. 1, Nilkanth Vikram Trivedi and petitioner no. 2, Subhashbhai Rambai Amin through the power of attorney holder namely, Shri Vikram Manubhai Trivedi.

2. The main prayers made in the writ petition are:-

“(A) Quash and set aside the impunged order dated 10/3/2015 passed by respondent No.2 at annexture-L and Direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the claim of the petitioners pending before him under Sec. 3H(3) of the Act and pass appropriate order within two weeks in the interest of justice;

(B) Direct the respondent no. 2 to deposit the entire amount of compensation of Rs. 48,00,443/- payable to the petitioner no.1 with 12% interest from 16/11/2013 till date in the registry of this Hon’ble Court within 7 days from date of order;

(C) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, by way of interim relief or ad-interim relief direct the respondent no. 2 to deposit entire amount of compensation of Rs.48,00,443/-along with interest and permit the petitioners to withdraw the amount from the Registry on submitting undertaking that in case any adverse order in the petition, petitioners will return the amount with interest;

(D) Such other and further order which deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may be passed the interest of justice;”

3. By the way of amendment, the following prayers have been added:-

“15.(F) Quash and set aside the appointment of Respondent No.6 as an arbitrator vide order no. NHAI/LA/RR/2001/9/1 dated 12/10/2011 issued by the first Respondent Central Govt. u/s 3G(5) of the National Highway Act-1956, and restrain him from working as arbitrator in Arbitration case of Petitioner No.1 immediately and to direct him to hand over the case papers to the arbitrator appointed by this Hon'ble High Court in the interest of justice;

(G) Appoint any Hon'ble former judge of High court of Gujarat as an arbitrator to carry out arbitration work u/s 3G (5) of the National Highway Act-1956 between Petitioner No.1 and central govt. in accordance with the provisions of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and in accordance with law;

(H) Declare the Sec. 3G (5) of the NH Act, 1956 is discriminatory, and violative to an extent of its contravention with Article 14 of The Constitution of India and is ultra vires and void.

(I) Declare that Sec.3J of the National Highway, 1956 is ultra vires the constitution, inoperative and provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013) applies to the acquisition of Petitioner No. 1 lands acquired as per Annexure-'Z' to the petition and declare that the Petitioner No.1 is entitled to get complete package of compensation and all the tax benefits which are extended to Land Acquisition under "RFCTLARR Act" and be pleased to pass appropriate orders to pay the same to the Petitioner No.1, in the interest of justice;

(J) Declare that the entire amount of compensation as per the calculation under "RFCTLARR Act" which is payable to the Petitioner No.1 is fully 100% Income Tax free as has been provided in Sec. 96 of the "RFCTLARR Act" be paid to the Petitioner No.1 and he is not liable to pay any tax on the entire amount of compensation and any other enhanced amount determined at higher stage of determination in the interest of justice;

(K) Direct the Respondent No.6 to deposit the entire amount of compensation under "RFCTLARR Act" which is payable to the Petitioner No.1, in the Registry of this Hon'ble High Court within 15 days from the order of the Hon'ble High Court in the interest of Justice;

(L) Dire

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top