Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO, J
VISHALSINH RAJENDRASINH BIHOLA – Appellant
Versus
BHAVESHKUMAR MANUBHAI PRAJAPATI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application details and background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the argument presented by both sides. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's position on the appeal. (Para 5) |
| 4. decision to allow leave to appeal. (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application is filed by the applicant - original complainant under Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “the BNSS ”) seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2024 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar (hereinafter referred to as the “ the learned appellate Court) acquitting the respondent No. 1 in Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 2024 filed by the respondent No. 1 challenging the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mansa in ( hereinafter referred to as “the learned Trial Court) in Criminal Case No. 362 of 2021 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 . (hereinafter referred to as the NI Act).
2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Keyur Vyas for the applicant and learned APP Ms. Chetna Shah for the respondent No.1 – State.
3. Learned advocate Mr. Keyur Vyas fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
