Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, D.N.RAY, J
TATA AIA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUJAY PANKAJBHAI SHAH (HUF) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the arbitral award under section 34. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. dispute about lease payment and notice validity. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's decision on occupancy rights and payment obligations. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. final decision to dismiss appeal and uphold the arbitral award. (Para 9) |
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. There is a leave note filed by learned advocate Mr. Vishal C. Mehta. However, Mr. Zalak Pipalia, learned advocate has put in appearance to submit that he has instructions to argue the matter. We, therefore, proceeded with the matter.
2. This is an appeal under Section-37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act’ 1996 [in short referred to as “The Act’ 1996”] challenging the award dated 22.02.2016 which has been affirmed with the dismissal of the application under Section 34 of the Act’ 1996 by judgment and order dated
09.05.2025.
3. Assailing the correctness of the award, learned counsel for the appellant made submissions on the merits of the award. However, the fact remains that the dispute referred to arbitration arose out of a lease agreement dated 05.09.2008, wherein the tenure of the lease was fixed for 06 years with effect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
