IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J. C. DOSHI, J
PAYALBEN ASHOKBHAI GOHIL @ MISTRI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ”the Code”), the petitioners have prayed for quashing and setting aside FIR being II-C.R. No.46 of 2019 registered with Rajula Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 504 , 506(2), 114 of the IPC as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR qua the petitioner herein.
2. Seeking quashment of the impugned FIR, learned advocate for the petitioners would submit that even if the allegations as levelled in the impugned complaint are taken at their face value, the essential ingredients so as to constitute the offences punishable under Sections 504 , 506(2), and 114 of the Indian Penal Code are, ex facie, not made out against the petitioner.
Upon such submission, he prays to allow this petition.
3. Per contra, learned advocate for the respondent has vehemently opposed the petition, contending that the allegations in the complaint, when read in their proper context, clearly satisfy the essential ingredients of the offences punishable under Sections 504 , 506(2), and 114 of the Indian Penal Code .
4. Learned APP consid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.