IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PRAKASHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SAGAR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
Present note for speaking to minutes is filed stating that the petitioner has not challenged the order of this Court and has sought to amend the order to include no coercive steps in the order and has requested to pass appropriate order.
Herein, the petitioner instead of challenging the order dated
04.09.2025 passed in Special Criminal Application No.12041 of 2025, by way of filing appropriate proceeding, the petitioner has filed note for speaking to minutes. However, in view of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Raghunath Sharma Vs. State of Haryana reported in 2025 INSC 723, and in case of Akhil Bhartvarshiya Marwari Agarwal Jatiya Kosh & Ors., Vs. Brijlal Tibrewal & Ors., reported in 2019 2 SCC 684, a note for speaking to Minutes is required to be entertained only for the limited purpose of correcting a typographical error or an error through oversight, which may have crept in while transcribing the original order. A note for speaking to Minutes cannot be considered at par with an application for clarification / modification of an order.
If the petitioner wants to challenge the said order then he has to file appropriate proceeding before the appropriate Cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.