Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, P. M. RAVAL, JJ
THAKOR LAXMANJI S/O FULAJI NAGARJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for suspension due to time served and potential for acquittal. (Para 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. opposition to suspension based on strong case evidence. (Para 4) |
| 3. guidelines for suspension of sentences in fixed term cases. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. court's rationale for granting suspension based on existing circumstances. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling allowing suspension of sentence. (Para 10 , 11) |
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.
2. The present application is preferred by the applicant – original accused under Section 430 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for suspension of sentence awarded to him vide judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 24.7.2025 by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana in Sessions Case No.2 of 2023.
3. Learned advocate Mr.Yogendra Thakore appearing for the applicant would submit that :
(a) That the applicant has got very strong prima facie case of acquittal.
(b) That the applicant accused has been convicted for a period of 5 years rigorous imprisonment under section 304(II) of IPC and the applicant has undergone 2 years, 10 months and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
