Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.Y. KOGJE, J
PIYUSH BABUBHAI ASLALIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application details under ndps act. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence and role in crime. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court’s analysis on organized crime. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. societal impact and denial of bail. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The present successive regular bail application is filed under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR bearing No.B- 11210015200082 of 2020 registered with DCB Police Station, Surat City for offence under Sections 8(C), 22(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act . 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is aged 31 years and is in jail since 04.11.2020. It is submitted that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
2.1 It is submitted that pursuant to registration of the FIR, now charge sheet is also filed long back. It is submitted that looking to the charge sheet papers, it has come on record that the applicant has no connection with the MD drug found from the conscious possession of other co-accused and at the time of arrest of the main accused, the applicant was not named in the complaint. It
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
