Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
SUNILBHAI RAMESHBHAI PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points with the appropriate references.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court considers prima facie evidence and factors influencing bail decisions. (Para 1) |
| 2. application filed for bail based on applicant's standing. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by parties highlight the perceived relationship and consent issues. (Para 3) |
| 4. concerns raised regarding the age and circumstances of the prosecutrix. (Para 5) |
| 5. court discussed relevant factors in granting bail. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. bail granted with specified conditions. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191035250086 of 2025 registered with Naroda Police Station. Ahmedabad City.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned advocate for the original complainant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
