Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY, J
VERSI MAYA HARIJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. limitation period for application begins from amended award date. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. rejection of application was based on erroneous legal advice. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. delay in challenging authority rejection noted. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. writ petitions allowed, directing reference to appropriate authority. (Para 11 , 12) |
MR ANAND R PATEL(2424) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS. HETAL PATEL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY Date : 28/07/2025 COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. All the writ petitions, raise a common question for consideration before this Court. They have been heard together with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties and are being decided by this common judgment.
2. Perused the additional affidavit filed on behalf of the original petitioners in compliance of the order dated
06.03.2025 passed by us. The petitioners herein are farmers who have been non-suited vide order dated 01.08.2019/24.09.2019 from making reference under Section 64 of the Right to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
