Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, P. M. RAVAL, JJ
RAJUJI PUNAJI THAKOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for suspension of sentence considered. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts of the applicant's conviction under ipc 323. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning for suspension eligibility. (Para 5) |
| 4. liberal suspension precedent established by the supreme court. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court allows the suspension of the applicant's sentence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.
2. The present application is preferred by the applicant – original accused under Section 430 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for suspension of sentence awarded to him vide judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 2.5.2025 by the learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Sessions Case No.44 of 2022.
3. Learned advocate Mr.J.V.Patel appearing for the applicant has mainly contended that the applicant has been convicted for the offence under section 323 of IPC and he has been ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs.2000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. It is submitted that the sentence imposed by t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
