ORAL JUDGMENT

1. RULE. Shri Chirag Patel, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no. 1, who is the main contesting party so far as the present Civil Revision Application is concerned.

2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the present application is taken up for final hearing today.

3. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 29 of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the applicants- original plaintiffs-original opponents nos. 1 and 2 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 56/2001 to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Navsari dated 12/08/2011 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 56/2001 by which the learned appellate Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by respondent no. 1-original defendant no. 1 and has quashed and set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court.

4. The applicants-original plaintiffs instituted Regular Civil Suit No. 100/1998 in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gandevi against the respondents-original defendant for recovery of