SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
M.R. SHAH, J
INOX LEISURE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MRS SWATI SOPARKAR
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. court outlines the procedural requirements for equity shareholder meetings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. application is favorably disposed of supporting the proposed amalgamation scheme. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD COMPANY APPLICATION No. 625 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= INOX LEISURE LTD. - Applicant(s) Versus . - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MRS SWATI SOPARKAR for Applicant(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 01/12/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top