GUJARAT HIGH COURT
M.R. SHAH, J
INOX LEISURE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court outlines the procedural requirements for equity shareholder meetings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. application is favorably disposed of supporting the proposed amalgamation scheme. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD COMPANY APPLICATION No. 625 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= INOX LEISURE LTD. - Applicant(s) Versus . - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MRS SWATI SOPARKAR for Applicant(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 01/12/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.