SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
M.R. SHAH, J
GANGARAM - PROPRIETOR OF A-ONE GARMENT AND CAP CORNER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR RAMNANDAN SINGH
For the Respondents: MR LB DABHI, MS NISHA PARIKH

Table of Content
1. case under section 138 settled with payment and consent. (Para 2 , 3)
2. parties inform court of amicable resolution. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court permits compounding; ruling made. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 550 of 2012 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? YES 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? NO 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? NO 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? NO 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? NO ========================================================= GANGARAM - PROPRITOR OF A-ONE GARMENT AND CAP CORNER - Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s) ======================================================

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top