PRAKASH RAMJIBHAI MARWADI vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
ANIL R. DAVE, KS JHAVERI, JJ
PRAKASH RAMJIBHAI MARWADI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR RAJESH K SHAH, MR YN LAKHANI, MR ASHISH DAGLI
For the Respondents: MR KT DAVE, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Table of Content
1. conviction based on ipc offenses (Para 1 , 2)
2. victim's inconsistent testimony (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. victim's multiple accounts of the incident (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. doubts raised by contradictory evidence (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. inadequate medical evidence linking accused (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
6. arguments against convicting based on testimony (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. failure to examine key witnesses (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
8. insufficient prosecution case leading to acquittal (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
9. appeals allowed, convictions quashed (Para 38 , 39)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2149 of 2005 With CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2455 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GUJARAT HIGH COURTANIL R. DAVE, KS JHAVERI, JJPRAKASH RAMJIBHAI MARWADI – AppellantVersusSTATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
ANIL R. DAVE, KS JHAVERI, JJ
PRAKASH RAMJIBHAI MARWADI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent