GUJARAT HIGH COURT
K.A. PUJ, J
Cifco Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Plastochem Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of company applications in liquidation (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD COMPANY APPLICATION No. 363 of 2000 In COMPANY PETITION No. 216 of 1996 With COMPANY APPLICATION No. 80 of 2001 In COMPANY PETITION No. 216 of 1996 With COMPANY APPLICATION No. 404 of 2003 In COMPANY PETITION No. 154 of 1998 With COMPANY APPLICATION No. 258 of 2004 In COMPANY PETITION No. 154 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? 2/28 JUDGMENT ================================================= CIFCO FINANCE LTD. - Applicant Versus KRISHNA PLASTOCHEM LTD. & 5 - Respondents ================================================= Appearance :
1. Company Application No. 363 of 2000
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.