SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
BAROT MUKESHKUMAR MANHARLAL – Appellant
Versus
BAROT KIRANBEN D/O CHHAGANLAL JIVABHAI – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Shri Hardik Bhrahmbhatt, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.

2. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-husband has prayed for an appropriate writ, direction and / or order quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 11.5.2007 passed by the learned 5th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Himatnagar passed below Exh. 10 in H.M.P. No. 5 of 2006 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, by which the learned trial Court has directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 1,000/- each to the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 by way of interim alimony from the date of the application.

3. Petitioner and the respondent No.1 are the husband and wife. There was a dispute between the husband and wife since many years and the respondent No. 1 is residing at her parental house since many years with her three daughters. Respondent No.1 wife had also filed Maintenance Application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as per the order passed by the learned Magistrate petitioner is paying Rs. 1100/- towards maintenance of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top