GUJARAT HIGH COURT
BAROT MUKESHKUMAR MANHARLAL – Appellant
Versus
BAROT KIRANBEN D/O CHHAGANLAL JIVABHAI – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Rule. Shri Hardik Bhrahmbhatt, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.
2. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-husband has prayed for an appropriate writ, direction and / or order quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 11.5.2007 passed by the learned 5th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Himatnagar passed below Exh. 10 in H.M.P. No. 5 of 2006 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, by which the learned trial Court has directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 1,000/- each to the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 by way of interim alimony from the date of the application.
3. Petitioner and the respondent No.1 are the husband and wife. There was a dispute between the husband and wife since many years and the respondent No. 1 is residing at her parental house since many years with her three daughters. Respondent No.1 wife had also filed Maintenance Application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as per the order passed by the learned Magistrate petitioner is paying Rs. 1100/- towards maintenance of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.