GUJARAT HIGH COURT
K.A.PUJ, J
SHASHIKANT SOMABHAI PATEL THRO' POA INDULAL.S.AMIN – Appellant
Versus
UMESHBHAI BABULAL SHAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership by power of attorney and allegations of forgery. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. necessity of proving irreparable loss for granting an injunction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. the trial judge's consideration of material facts and previous transactions. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 4. final decision dismissing the appeal based on sound judicial reasoning. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 304 of 2006 with CIVIL APPLICATION No.12140 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= SHASHIKANT SOMABHAI PATEL THRO' POA INDULAL.S.AMIN & 1 - Appellant(s) Versus UMESHBHAI BABULAL SHAH & 6 - Respondent(s) ===========
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.