SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
K.A.PUJ, J
SHASHIKANT SOMABHAI PATEL THRO' POA INDULAL.S.AMIN – Appellant
Versus
UMESHBHAI BABULAL SHAH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR CH VORA, MR S.M.SHah
For the Respondents: MR DC DAVE

Table of Content
1. ownership by power of attorney and allegations of forgery. (Para 1 , 4)
2. necessity of proving irreparable loss for granting an injunction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. the trial judge's consideration of material facts and previous transactions. (Para 8 , 11)
4. final decision dismissing the appeal based on sound judicial reasoning. (Para 10 , 12 , 13)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 304 of 2006 with CIVIL APPLICATION No.12140 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= SHASHIKANT SOMABHAI PATEL THRO' POA INDULAL.S.AMIN & 1 - Appellant(s) Versus UMESHBHAI BABULAL SHAH & 6 - Respondent(s) ===========

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top