GUJARAT HIGH COURT
RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J
SARASWATI TRADING COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal entity status is crucial for filing complaints. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. cognizance requires a valid entity as per the act. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. interpretation of legal status influences the application of law. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 785 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge? ========================================================= SARASWATI TRADING COMPANY Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER ========================================================= Appearance : MR VIRAT G POPAT for the Petitioner MR HL JANI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No.1 ==================================================
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.