SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX – Appellant
Versus
RATANAMANI METALS & TUBES LIMITED (S.P.DIVISION) – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)

The present tax appeal is directed against the order dated 03.10.2011 of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad passed in Appeal No.E/3040/2006, proposing the following question as a substantial questions of law:-

“(i) Whether filing of RT 12 Returns by the Respondent sufficient without filing the Declaration required under Rule 173 C of the Central Excise Rules?

(ii) Whether the extended period of limitation could have been invoked in the facts of the case under the proviso to section 11A (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944?

(iii) Whether Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in arriving at a conclusion that there was no suppression on the part of the Respondent more particularly when the declaration under Rule 173 C was admittedly not filed by the Respondent?

(iv) Whether the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in allowing the Appeal filed by the Respondent?”

2.We heard learned advocate Mr.Amar M. Bhatt appearing for the appellant.

3.The relevant facts involved in the appeal and with reference to which the aforesaid questions are proposed, are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top