SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
AKIL KURESHI, J
LAXMINARAYAN RAMSWARAOOP SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR KAMLESHWAR SINGH
For the Respondents: MR IM PANDYA, APP

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 822 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= LAXMINARAYAN RAMSWARAOOP SHARMA - Appellant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT - Opponent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR KAMLESHWAR SINGH for Appellant(s) : 1, MR IM PANDYA, APP for Opponent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 12-13/04/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT 1.In this appeal, the appellant-original accused has challenged the legality of a judgement dated 31-07-2000 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top