GUJARAT HIGH COURT
M.R. SHAH, J
M/S GHCL LIMITED THROUGH KAMLESH H MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
KUNAL MADHUBHAI PATEL PROP.IN THE NAME AND STYLE AS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over limitation and the need for evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the court's jurisdiction and rejection of plaint. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observation on necessity for trial. (Para 7) |
| 4. final decision regarding dismissal of the application. (Para 8) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 150 of 2012 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================= M/S GHCL LIMITED THROUGH KAMLESH H MEHTA - Applicant(s) Versus KUNAL MADHUBHAI PATEL PROP.IN THE NAME AND STYLE AS - Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance : MR DIGANT M POPAT for Applicant(s) : 1, MR SP MAJMUDAR for Respondent(s) : 1, =======
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.