SHREE JAGDISH SWEETS AND FARSAN AND ANOTHER vs JAGDISH FOODS PVT LTD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
P.B. Majmudar, J
SHREE JAGDISH SWEETS AND FARSAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH FOODS PVT LTD – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Y.J. Trivedi
For the Respondents: G.C. Ray

Table of Content
1. plaintiff has established business history and trademark registration. (Para 2)
2. court analysis supports plaintiff's case for trademark protection. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 18)
3. arguments on trademark distinctiveness and market confusion. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 9)
4. criteria for passing off: prior use and goodwill established. (Para 14 , 17)
5. court upholds trial court's injunction against defendants. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 343 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ====================================== SHREE JAGDISH SWEETS AND FARSAN AND ANOTHER Versus JAGDISH FOODS PVT LTD ====================================== Appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GUJARAT HIGH COURTP.B. Majmudar, JSHREE JAGDISH SWEETS AND FARSAN AND ANOTHER – AppellantVersusJAGDISH FOODS PVT LTD – Respondent

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
P.B. Majmudar, J
SHREE JAGDISH SWEETS AND FARSAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH FOODS PVT LTD – Respondent