STANDARD CHARTERED BANK vs DHANANJAY JAGDISHCHANDRA GOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK – Appellant
Versus
DHANANJAY JAGDISHCHANDRA GOR – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR CHINTAN R. ABICHANDANI
For the Respondents: MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI, MR.A.J. DESAI, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Table of Content
1. introduction of the parties and overview of the legal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. responsive arguments and observations by the court regarding ownership and loan acknowledgment. (Para 3 , 7 , 8)
3. detailing of the vehicle's ownership history and the bank's involvement in financing. (Para 4 , 5)
4. application of established legal principles regarding property rights. (Para 6)
5. final decision to restore vehicle custody to the bank with conditions. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 917 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= STANDARD CHARTERED BANK - Applicant(s) Versus D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GUJARAT HIGH COURTRAVI R. TRIPATHI, JSTANDARD CHARTERED BANK – AppellantVersusDHANANJAY JAGDISHCHANDRA GOR – Respondent

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK – Appellant
Versus
DHANANJAY JAGDISHCHANDRA GOR – Respondent