Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J
RAZAKBHAI AHMEDBHAI GANATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the appeal and initial complaint regarding the bounced cheques. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the adequacy of the reasons for the acquittal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observation on the insufficiency of the lower appellate court's reasoning. (Para 6) |
| 4. final decision to allow the appeal and remand the case for fresh hearing. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2289 of 2009 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= RAZAKBHAI AHMEDBHAI GANATRA - Appellant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Opponent(s) =========================================================
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
